i20 vs XUV 3XO
Ex-showroom prices and the specifications that have been published. Rows that differ are marked.
The Wheelsio Verdict
Published pros for each vehicle. A written verdict appears only when one is stored.
“XUV 3XO takes the lead with higher composite scores, standing out especially in crash test protection, lower fuel consumption, punchy performance. While i20 remains a capable contender, XUV 3XO offers greater return per rupee spent.”
The Differences That Actually Matter
Stripping away marketing jargon: how these two vehicles perform across the 5 essential pillars of ownership.
Safety Architecture & Protection
Not published
6
5-Star Bharat NCAP
6
Engine Performance
83.1 PS
114.7 Nm
111.5 PS
200 Nm
Fuel Economy
16 - 20 km/l
Shown only for km/l, km/kg, or km per charge
17.96 - 21.2 km/l
Shown only for km/l, km/kg, or km per charge
Ownership figures on record
Only stored mileage, service, insurance, and depreciation figures are shown. Missing items are left out.
i20
XUV 3XO
Recommended Variants Compared
Compare matching price brackets and sweet-spot trim packages side-by-side.
Magna Executive
1197 cc • Manual • 16 km/l
REVX M
1197 cc • Manual • 18.89 km/l
Full Specification Sheet
Side-by-side engineering data and equipment levels.
Frequently Asked Questions
Direct, objective answers to the most common head-to-head questions asked by prospective buyers.
Related Segment Shootouts & Alternatives
Explore more head-to-head automotive matchups for i20 and XUV 3XO
XUV 3XO vs XUV 7XO
Compare XUV 3XO with XUV 7XO
i20 vs Amaze
Compare i20 with Amaze
XUV 3XO vs Amaze
Compare XUV 3XO with Amaze
i20 vs AircrossX
Compare i20 with AircrossX
XUV 3XO vs AircrossX
Compare XUV 3XO with AircrossX
i20 vs Astor
Compare i20 with Astor