i20 vs Astor
Ex-showroom prices and the specifications that have been published. Rows that differ are marked.
The Wheelsio Verdict
Published pros for each vehicle. A written verdict appears only when one is stored.
“i20 takes the lead with higher composite scores, standing out especially in crash test protection, lower fuel consumption. While Astor remains a capable contender, i20 offers greater return per rupee spent.”
Who Should Buy Which Car?
Match your daily driving patterns, passenger habits, and ownership priorities to the right machine.
Choose Astor if:
- Families looking for good ground clearance, solid safety, and enough cabin space for highway road trips.
The Differences That Actually Matter
Stripping away marketing jargon: how these two vehicles perform across the 5 essential pillars of ownership.
Engine Performance
83.1 PS
114.7 Nm
108 bhp
144 Nm
Fuel Economy
16 - 20 km/l
Shown only for km/l, km/kg, or km per charge
14.82 - 15.43 km/l (ARAI)
Shown only for km/l, km/kg, or km per charge
Ownership figures on record
Only stored mileage, service, insurance, and depreciation figures are shown. Missing items are left out.
i20
Astor
Recommended Variants Compared
Compare matching price brackets and sweet-spot trim packages side-by-side.
Magna Executive
1197 cc • Manual • 16 km/l
Shine
VTi-TECH, 1498 cc • Manual • 15.43 km/l (ARAI)
Full Specification Sheet
Side-by-side engineering data and equipment levels.
Frequently Asked Questions
Direct, objective answers to the most common head-to-head questions asked by prospective buyers.
Related Segment Shootouts & Alternatives
Explore more head-to-head automotive matchups for i20 and Astor
Astor vs XUV 7XO
Compare Astor with XUV 7XO
i20 vs Amaze
Compare i20 with Amaze
Astor vs Amaze
Compare Astor with Amaze
i20 vs AircrossX
Compare i20 with AircrossX
Astor vs AircrossX
Compare Astor with AircrossX
i20 vs XUV 3XO
Compare i20 with XUV 3XO