Grand i10 Nios vs Baleno
Ex-showroom prices and the specifications that have been published. Rows that differ are marked.
The Wheelsio Verdict
Published pros for each vehicle. A written verdict appears only when one is stored.
“Baleno takes the lead with higher composite scores, standing out especially in lower fuel consumption. While Grand i10 Nios remains a capable contender, Baleno offers greater return per rupee spent.”
Who Should Buy Which Car?
Match your daily driving patterns, passenger habits, and ownership priorities to the right machine.
Choose Baleno if:
- First-time buyers, small families, and city commuters who want an easy-to-park car with great mileage.
The Differences That Actually Matter
Stripping away marketing jargon: how these two vehicles perform across the 5 essential pillars of ownership.
Engine Performance
83.1 PS
113.8 Nm
83.1 PS
112.4 Nm
Fuel Economy
16 - 18 km/l
Shown only for km/l, km/kg, or km per charge
23.8 - 24.77 km/l (ARAI)
Shown only for km/l, km/kg, or km per charge
Ownership figures on record
Only stored mileage, service, insurance, and depreciation figures are shown. Missing items are left out.
Grand i10 Nios
Baleno
Recommended Variants Compared
Compare matching price brackets and sweet-spot trim packages side-by-side.
Magna
1197 cc • Manual • 18 km/l
Delta
1197 cc • Manual • 23.8 km/l
Full Specification Sheet
Side-by-side engineering data and equipment levels.
Frequently Asked Questions
Direct, objective answers to the most common head-to-head questions asked by prospective buyers.
Related Segment Shootouts & Alternatives
Explore more head-to-head automotive matchups for Grand i10 Nios and Baleno
Grand i10 Nios vs Amaze
Compare Grand i10 Nios with Amaze
Baleno vs Amaze
Compare Baleno with Amaze
Baleno vs AircrossX
Compare Baleno with AircrossX
Baleno vs Astor
Compare Baleno with Astor
Grand i10 Nios vs XUV 3XO
Compare Grand i10 Nios with XUV 3XO
Baleno vs XUV 3XO
Compare Baleno with XUV 3XO