XUV 3XO vs Harrier
Ex-showroom prices and the specifications that have been published. Rows that differ are marked.
The Wheelsio Verdict
Published pros for each vehicle. A written verdict appears only when one is stored.
“XUV 3XO takes the lead with higher composite scores, standing out especially in crash test protection. While Harrier remains a capable contender, XUV 3XO offers greater return per rupee spent.”
The Differences That Actually Matter
Stripping away marketing jargon: how these two vehicles perform across the 5 essential pillars of ownership.
Safety Architecture & Protection
5-Star Bharat NCAP
6
Not published
6
Engine Performance
111.5 PS
200 Nm
169.9 PS
280 Nm
Fuel Economy
17.96 - 21.2 km/l
Shown only for km/l, km/kg, or km per charge
Not published
Shown only for km/l, km/kg, or km per charge
Ownership figures on record
Only stored mileage, service, insurance, and depreciation figures are shown. Missing items are left out.
XUV 3XO
Harrier
Recommended Variants Compared
Compare matching price brackets and sweet-spot trim packages side-by-side.
REVX M
1197 cc • Manual • 18.89 km/l
Smart
1956 cc • Manual •
Full Specification Sheet
Side-by-side engineering data and equipment levels.
Frequently Asked Questions
Direct, objective answers to the most common head-to-head questions asked by prospective buyers.
Related Segment Shootouts & Alternatives
Explore more head-to-head automotive matchups for XUV 3XO and Harrier
XUV 3XO vs XUV 7XO
Compare XUV 3XO with XUV 7XO
Harrier vs XUV 7XO
Compare Harrier with XUV 7XO
XUV 3XO vs Amaze
Compare XUV 3XO with Amaze
XUV 3XO vs AircrossX
Compare XUV 3XO with AircrossX
Harrier vs AircrossX
Compare Harrier with AircrossX
Harrier vs Atto 3
Compare Harrier with Atto 3