Xtreme 250R vs Classic 350
Ex-showroom prices and the specifications that have been published. Rows that differ are marked.
The Wheelsio Verdict
Published pros for each vehicle. A written verdict appears only when one is stored.
“Classic 350 takes the lead with higher composite scores, standing out especially in overall balance and value. While Xtreme 250R remains a capable contender, Classic 350 offers greater return per rupee spent.”
The Differences That Actually Matter
Stripping away marketing jargon: how these two vehicles perform across the 5 essential pillars of ownership.
Engine Performance
30 PS
25.3 Nm
20.2 PS
27 Nm
Fuel Economy
Not published
Shown only for km/l, km/kg, or km per charge
41.55 km/l
Shown only for km/l, km/kg, or km per charge
Ownership figures on record
Only stored mileage, service, insurance, and depreciation figures are shown. Missing items are left out.
Xtreme 250R
Classic 350
Recommended Variants Compared
Compare matching price brackets and sweet-spot trim packages side-by-side.
Standard
249.03 cc • 6-speed Manual •
Heritage
349.0 cc • Manual • 41.55 km/l
Full Specification Sheet
Side-by-side engineering data and equipment levels.
Frequently Asked Questions
Direct, objective answers to the most common head-to-head questions asked by prospective buyers.
Related Segment Shootouts & Alternatives
Explore more head-to-head automotive matchups for Xtreme 250R and Classic 350
Classic 350 vs Pulsar N160
Compare Classic 350 with Pulsar N160
Classic 350 vs Apache RTR 160
Compare Classic 350 with Apache RTR 160
Xtreme 250R vs Apache RTR 160 4V
Compare Xtreme 250R with Apache RTR 160 4V
Classic 350 vs Apache RTR 160 4V
Compare Classic 350 with Apache RTR 160 4V
Xtreme 250R vs Xtreme 160R 4V
Compare Xtreme 250R with Xtreme 160R 4V
Classic 350 vs Xtreme 160R 4V
Compare Classic 350 with Xtreme 160R 4V