Xtreme 160R 4V vs Classic 350
Ex-showroom prices and the specifications that have been published. Rows that differ are marked.
The Wheelsio Verdict
Published pros for each vehicle. A written verdict appears only when one is stored.
“Classic 350 takes the lead with higher composite scores, standing out especially in punchy performance. While Xtreme 160R 4V remains a capable contender, Classic 350 offers greater return per rupee spent.”
The Differences That Actually Matter
Stripping away marketing jargon: how these two vehicles perform across the 5 essential pillars of ownership.
Engine Performance
17.1 PS
14.6 Nm
20.2 PS
27 Nm
Fuel Economy
Not published
Shown only for km/l, km/kg, or km per charge
41.55 km/l
Shown only for km/l, km/kg, or km per charge
Ownership figures on record
Only stored mileage, service, insurance, and depreciation figures are shown. Missing items are left out.
Xtreme 160R 4V
Classic 350
Recommended Variants Compared
Compare matching price brackets and sweet-spot trim packages side-by-side.
Pro
163.2 cc • 5-speed Manual •
Heritage
349.0 cc • Manual • 41.55 km/l
Full Specification Sheet
Side-by-side engineering data and equipment levels.
Frequently Asked Questions
Direct, objective answers to the most common head-to-head questions asked by prospective buyers.
Related Segment Shootouts & Alternatives
Explore more head-to-head automotive matchups for Xtreme 160R 4V and Classic 350
Xtreme 160R 4V vs Super Splendor XTEC
Compare Xtreme 160R 4V with Super Splendor XTEC
Xtreme 160R 4V vs Pulsar N160
Compare Xtreme 160R 4V with Pulsar N160
Classic 350 vs Pulsar N160
Compare Classic 350 with Pulsar N160
Xtreme 160R 4V vs Unicorn
Compare Xtreme 160R 4V with Unicorn
Xtreme 160R 4V vs Glamour
Compare Xtreme 160R 4V with Glamour
Xtreme 160R 4V vs Raider
Compare Xtreme 160R 4V with Raider