Xtreme 160R 4V vs Raider
Ex-showroom prices and the specifications that have been published. Rows that differ are marked.
The Wheelsio Verdict
Published pros for each vehicle. A written verdict appears only when one is stored.
“Raider takes the lead with higher composite scores, standing out especially in overall balance and value. While Xtreme 160R 4V remains a capable contender, Raider offers greater return per rupee spent.”
The Differences That Actually Matter
Stripping away marketing jargon: how these two vehicles perform across the 5 essential pillars of ownership.
Engine Performance
17.1 PS
14.6 Nm
11.4 PS
11.2 Nm
Fuel Economy
Not published
Shown only for km/l, km/kg, or km per charge
67 km/l
Shown only for km/l, km/kg, or km per charge
Ownership figures on record
Only stored mileage, service, insurance, and depreciation figures are shown. Missing items are left out.
Xtreme 160R 4V
Raider
Recommended Variants Compared
Compare matching price brackets and sweet-spot trim packages side-by-side.
Pro
163.2 cc • 5-speed Manual •
Single Seat
124.8 cc • Manual • 67 km/l
Full Specification Sheet
Side-by-side engineering data and equipment levels.
Frequently Asked Questions
Direct, objective answers to the most common head-to-head questions asked by prospective buyers.
Related Segment Shootouts & Alternatives
Explore more head-to-head automotive matchups for Xtreme 160R 4V and Raider
Xtreme 160R 4V vs Super Splendor XTEC
Compare Xtreme 160R 4V with Super Splendor XTEC
Raider vs Super Splendor XTEC
Compare Raider with Super Splendor XTEC
Raider vs Splendor Plus
Compare Raider with Splendor Plus
Raider vs Shine 100
Compare Raider with Shine 100
Xtreme 160R 4V vs Pulsar N160
Compare Xtreme 160R 4V with Pulsar N160
Raider vs Pulsar N160
Compare Raider with Pulsar N160