296 GTB vs AMG GT
Ex-showroom prices and the specifications that have been published. Rows that differ are marked.
The Wheelsio Verdict
Published pros for each vehicle. A written verdict appears only when one is stored.
“296 GTB takes the lead with higher composite scores, standing out especially in lower fuel consumption. While AMG GT remains a capable contender, 296 GTB offers greater return per rupee spent.”
Who Should Buy Which Car?
Match your daily driving patterns, passenger habits, and ownership priorities to the right machine.
Choose 296 GTB if:
- Everyday car buyers looking for a dependable vehicle that balances features, comfort, and sensible pricing.
Choose AMG GT if:
- Everyday car buyers looking for a dependable vehicle that balances features, comfort, and sensible pricing.
The Differences That Actually Matter
Stripping away marketing jargon: how these two vehicles perform across the 5 essential pillars of ownership.
Engine Performance
830 PS @ 8000 rpm
740 Nm @ 6250 rpm
612 PS
850 Nm
Fuel Economy
14.0 km/l
Shown only for km/l, km/kg, or km per charge
8.0 km/l
Shown only for km/l, km/kg, or km per charge
Ownership figures on record
Only stored mileage, service, insurance, and depreciation figures are shown. Missing items are left out.
296 GTB
AMG GT
Recommended Variants Compared
Compare matching price brackets and sweet-spot trim packages side-by-side.
296 GTB
3.0L 120-Degree Twin-Turbo V6 + Electric Motor (830 PS / 740 Nm) • Automatic • 14.0 km/l
GT 63 Pro 4MATIC+
3982 cc twin-turbo V8, 612 PS / 850 Nm • Automatic • 8.0 km/l
Full Specification Sheet
Side-by-side engineering data and equipment levels.
Frequently Asked Questions
Direct, objective answers to the most common head-to-head questions asked by prospective buyers.
Related Segment Shootouts & Alternatives
Explore more head-to-head automotive matchups for 296 GTB and AMG GT